How to teach my child to share?

How to teach my child to share?

[mme_highlight] The concept of equal sharing develops early in childhood, although there is a known gap between this and its reflection on children’s actions. Recent data from studies suggested that although 3-year-old children know the norm of fair sharing, they seem to attach to this norm increasingly with age when sharing involves a cost to the self.[mme_highlight]

Young children use to be convict defenders of fairness and sharing concepts, but many times act otherwise when given a chance to share, which is a curious and interesting discrepancy to analyze, although few scientific studies have focused on this. Parents, caretakers and educators face challenges in the way to teach children to share and have trouble predicting the effective result of their efforts.

At what age do children understand the value of sharing?

Recent results from research have demonstrated the understanding of fairness and sharing starts at young age. It appears that 2-year-ols expect equal outcomes when two people receive resources from a third person; in addition, children at this age expect unequal outcomes after an equal effort. At the age of 3, children can apply concepts of equality in the adequate situations.
Nevertheless, despite this early understanding of equality and sharing values, children often show a self-interested behavior when they see a possible benefit, thus creating a gap between their fairness conception and their actual behavior. In fact, preschool children rarely are seen sharing with peers.

Possible explanations for this gap between concept and action are: children may believe that the rules of fairness only applies to others; young children, even if thinking that fairness applies to everyone, may disbelieve that others will follow these norms; finally, even if feeling obliged to follow fairness in sharing, may fail at this because of conflict caused by their own desires.

Sharing – is there a gap between the concept and the action among young children?

Addressing this interesting topic, Smith CE et al. conducted recently a study in which 3 to 8-year-old children were assigned to one of two groups and given 4 smiley-face stickers.

In the Self-Share/Other-Norm group children could actually share the stickers with another child (Self-Share), and were also asked how much another child should have shared in the same situation (Other-Norm).

In the Self-Norm/Other-Share, children were asked how much they should share (Self-Norm), and to predict how much the other child had shared (Other-Share).

The desirable number of stickers for kids to share was, obviously, half of what they got, thus 2 tickers. Did they? As the boxes below show, a switch in sharing practice was noticeable with age. For the self-share task, children aged 3 to 6 years shared significantly less than half of the stickers. By contrast, 7 to 8-year-olds got very close to the half. The same tendency occurred for the Self-Norm task, in which children of all ages judged that they themselves should share about half the stickers.

[mme_databox]

Average number of stickers shared by children in the Self Share Task

  • 3- 4 year-olds: average = 0.50 stickers (p>0.001 – statistically significant)
  • 5–6-year-olds: average = 1.15 stickers (p<0.001– statistically significant).
  • 7-8 year-olds: average =1.71 (p= 0.16).

[/mme_databox]

Concerning the Other-Norm task, children of all ages judged that the other child should give them about half or more of the stickers. The same tendency occurred for the Self-Norm task, in which children of all ages judged that they themselves should share about half the stickers.

[mme_databox]

Average number of stickers children predicted the other would share in the Other-Norm Task

  • 3- 4 year-olds: average = 2.40 stickers  (p>0.35)
  • 5–6-year-olds: average = 2.35 stickers (p>0.35)
  • 7-8 year-olds: average =1.90 (p>0.35)

[/mme_databox]

[mme_databox]

Average number of stickers children thought themselves should share in the Self-Norm Task

  • 3- 4 year-olds: average = 1.76 stickers  (p>0.33)
  • 5–6-year-olds: average = 2.00 stickers (p>0.33)
  • 7-8 year-olds: average =2.00(p>0.33)

[/mme_databox]

Reporting to the Other-Share task, children of all ages believed that the other child either shared significantly more than or something very close to an equal sharing of stickers.

[mme_databox]

Average number of stickers children believed the other shared in the Other-Share Task

  • 3- 4 year-olds: average = 2.82 stickers  (p<0.01 – statistically significant)
  • 5–6-year-olds: average = 2.20 stickers (p>0.08)
  • 7-8 year-olds: average =2.25(p>0.08)

[/mme_databox]

How do children conceptualize ownership?

There is an intrinsic connection between the concepts of sharing and ownership. It is thought that both children and adults attribute ownership of an object to the first person they see possessing it in the first place. Eisenberg-Berg and et al. recognized this feature when they presented 2 to 5-year-old children with a new toy and studied how they interacted with the toy with the presence of other children. Children who were told that the toy belonged only to them defended their possession in a more aggressive way than children who heard that the toy belonged to the entire class.

Summary and Recommendations

  • The concept of equal sharing develops early in childhood, although there is a known gap between this and its reflection on children’s actions.
  • Recent data from studies suggested that although 3-year-old children know the norm of fair sharing, they seem to attach to this norm increasingly with age when sharing involves a cost to the self.
  • Give yourself the example of sharing.
  • A good attachment with parents enhances the general well-being of a child. A loved child will be more prone to share with others.
  • Read stories from picture books and see films in which sharing is the main morality. Children learn a lot by examples.
  • Play “sharing games” with your children, with real life situations: use flowers, chocolates and so on.
  • Interphere only if needed: many times, parents see discussions about sharing between children and tend to interphere; try to give children space to solve these issues. Use sentences like: “I know Martha will give you the doll when she has finished playing with it”.
  • Be comprehensive to your child: sometimes, it may not be a question of lacking generosity. For instance, if a child has done some construction and is trying to keep other children away from it to prevent it from being destroyed.
  • Plan along with other parents: if your child has difficulty in sharing his/her toys and his/her friend is coming over, ask the other child’s parents to bring toys too; children love to play with different toys and will understand that in order to have access to these toys they have to share theirs too.

[mme_references]
References

[/mme_references]

When are children ready for school?

How do I know my child is ready for school?

[mme_highlight] Criteria for children’s readiness to school were revised by the National Educational Goals Panel (NEGP), encompassing the following domains: physical well-being and motor development; social and emotional development; child’s approach to learning; language development; cognition and general knowledge. Readiness of communities and schools has to be reflected in a well defined set of indicators. [mme_highlight]

School Readiness results from the interaction and has its foundations on the readiness of the child, readiness of the school and readiness of the family and community too. Education does not begin with kindergarten so parents must keep in mind that their children early experiences can greatly affect their later achievement in school.
General well-being, health, adequate motor, social and cognitive development are essential components of school readiness. Despite the general lack of agreement on what constitutes readiness or how to measure it, there are some points of consensus that constitute key indicators of the readiness of a child for school.

What is the definition of school readiness?

Kindergarten readiness seems to be gaining more and more importance; inclusively, it is the first stated goal of the National Educational Goals Panel (NEGP), established in 1990. Nevertheless, the concept of “readiness” is poorly defined and is interpreted differently in different contexts, mostly because not only the child, but also school and community are included in it and should be ready too.

The NHES index was presented in 1993 as a way of approaching the measure of readiness. It included five items:

  • Not sleepy or tired in class;
  • Not hard to understand what the child is saying;
  • Enthusiastic and interested in lots of different things;
  • No trouble taking turns or sharing;
  • Not restless, sits still.

[mme_databox]

Percentage of children meeting the 5 NHES criteria for school readiness

  • 5 criteria: 63%
  • 4 criteria: 26%
  • 3 criteria: 9%
  • less than 3 criteria: 2%.
  • (after parents’ reports of teacher assessments)
    [/mme_databox]

    The latter criteria for children’s readiness to school were revised by the National Educational Goals Panel (NEGP), encompassing the following domains:

    • Physical well-being and motor development;
    • Social and emotional development;
    • Child’s approach to learning;
    • Language development;
    • Cognition and general knowledge.

    There is actually some degree of overlap and correlation between the cited domains, however the point is that a child’s readiness is no longer focused on mastering specific skills, but rather recognizes development as a whole. It should also be noted that each child is different and develops at a different pace, but the domains mastered before kindergarten entry are also influenced by early experiences, including enrollment in quality daycare, cultural environment, inborn developmental conditions, as well as family risk factors.

    All children will certainly benefit from kindergarten experience, but those with better previous early learning experiences have better odds to succeed.

    What are parents’ and teachers’ views of school readiness?

    Accordingly to the National Association for the Education of Young Children (U.S.), “Every child, except in extreme instances of abuse, neglect, or disability, enters school ready to learn.” However, for the majority of parents and teachers this does not fully defines readiness to school as it is no guarantee of academic success. Teachers and parents’ views are shown in the boxes below.

    [mme_databox]

    Parents and teachers assessment of school readiness criteria

    Percentage of preschoolers’ parents and teachers who rated each item in a survey as “essential” or “very important” for school readiness (U.S. Department of Education)

     Percentage of ParentsPercentage of Teachers
    Physical health / well nourished0%96%
    Communicates needs, wants, thoughts92%84%
    Enthusiastic and curious about lots and different things84%78%
    Can follow directions0%60%
    Not disruptive of the class0%60%
    Sensitive to other children’s feelings0%58%
    Takes turn and shares92%55%
    Sits still and pays attention80%42%
    Can use pencil and brush65%21%
    Knows letters of the alphabet58%10%
    Can count to 20 or more59%7%

    [/mme_databox]

    How can schools and communities promote school readiness?

    One could answer this in short: taking care of our children the best possible way. Nevertheless, at a population scale, these words are not enough. Readiness of communities and schools has to be supported by political measures and has to be reflected in a well defined set of indicators to be accomplished. Important measures to pay attention to are:

    • improving health prevention programs and its population coverage, with special focus on hearing, vision, or dental problems;
    • assure children are enrolled in high-quality early education and child care programs;
    • provide free access to culture and organized activities.
    • /ul>

      Summary and Recommendations

      • Although the concept of school readiness is not a consensual one, with parents, schools and communities showing different perspectives, the general criteria for children’s readiness to school were revised by the National Educational Goals Panel (NEGP), encompassing the following domains: physical well-being and motor development; social and emotional development; child’s approach to learning; language development; cognition and general knowledge.
      • Children’s readiness to school is greatly influenced by early learning experiences, including enrollment in quality daycare, cultural environment, inborn developmental conditions, as well as family risk factors.
      • Readiness to school does not only imply readiness of the child, but also readiness of schools and communities. Hence, political measures and well defined indicators should be on focus to prepare children for school with great and equal standards.

      [mme_references]
      References

      • High PC, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Early Childhood, Adoption, and Dependent Care and Council on School Health. School readiness. Pediatrics 2008; 121:e1008.
      • National Education Goals Panel. The Goal 1. Technical Planning Subgroup Report on School Readiness. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel; 1991.
      • Lewit EM,Baker LS. School Readiness. Future Child. 1995 Summer-Fall;5(2):128-39.
      • S. Department of Education. Readiness for kindergarten: Parent and teacher beliefs. Statistics in brief, NCES 93-257.
      • Willer B, Bredekamp S. Public policy report: redefining readiness: an essential requisite for educational reform. Young Child. 1990;45(5):22–24.

      [mme_references]